Marvelous Solitude by Lina Bolzoni

Marvelous Solitude

The Art of Reading in Early Modern Europe

Lina Bolzoni, Sylvia Greenup

WW Norton · Print & ebook · December 5, 2023

A Times Literary Supplement Best Book of the Year A preeminent Renaissance scholar illuminates early modern encounters with books, in which literature became a portal to self-awareness and miraculous communion between author and reader.

Buy on Amazon

We earn from qualifying purchases.

Who it’s for
Lina Bolzoni traces how early modern writers imagined reading as dialogue and self-fashioning.
Genres
Renaissance Literary Criticism, Books & Reading, Renaissance History
Published
WW Norton, December 5, 2023

Nearest books

Matched by what the books are about, then ordered by what their readers also loved. Most of these share its genre: Renaissance History.

  1. The SwerveStephen Greenblatt66% match
  2. Hollow MenSusan Gaylard61% matchAlso shares Renaissance Literary Criticism
  3. My Roman HistoryAlizah Holstein61% match
  4. Botticelli's SecretJoseph Luzzi60% match
  5. The Renaissance: a Very Short IntroductionJerry Brotton60% match

For younger readers: The Renaissance in Europe, What Was the Renaissance?, Da Vinci's Tiger

Start with three books, and this one can be the first.

Members get a new edition every morning: a route out from their books to essays, research and talks, with the reason for each.

Start with this book

About this book

A Times Literary Supplement Best Book of the Year A preeminent Renaissance scholar illuminates early modern encounters with books, in which literature became a portal to self-awareness and miraculous communion between author and reader. The experience of reading is often presented as personal and transformative—a journey of self-discovery and, perhaps, renewal. In A Marvelous Solitude, Lina Bolzoni examines the early modern roots of this attitude toward the readerly act.

Continue reading

Between the fourteenth and sixteenth centuries, European men of letters increasingly came to see books as something more than compendia of knowledge: they could also help readers understand the human condition. As Bolzoni shows, Petrarch, Boccaccio, Machiavelli, Montaigne, and Tasso all presented reading as a private encounter and a dialogue with the author. For many Renaissance intellectuals, reading was instrumental to the construction of the self, which was enriched by contact with other learned men. These readers imagined the book as a mirror image of its author, with whom they held a secret affinity. In their letters to one another, humanists described the book as a body, reflecting the notion that reading literature placed its author in the room with oneself. Reading the work of a deceased author became akin to a necromantic rite, as the writers of bygone times were resurrected and placed in contemporary conversation. The vogue for hanging portraits of authors in libraries and studios ensured that the image of the creator was never far from his words, cementing bonds of friendship across barriers of time. These myths—charming, fragile, and powerful—invested the readerly encounter with miraculous properties that lingered in the hearts of the Romantics. And something of those wonders persists today, in the intimate feeling that reading yet provokes.

Renaissance Reading

Lina Bolzoni traces how early modern writers imagined reading as dialogue and self-fashioning.

Come here for

  • Petrarch, Boccaccio, Machiavelli, Montaigne, and Tasso on reading
  • Books as mirrors of authors and private encounters

Expect

  • Fourteenth- to sixteenth-century European ideas about books
  • Letters, author portraits, and reading across time

Where it sits

Books & Reading53%
Renaissance Literary Criticism43%
Renaissance History38%

Percentages are BookFrontier’s reading of the book.

Publisher categories

  • Italian Literary Criticism
  • Renaissance Literary Criticism
  • 16th-Century Literary Criticism
Authors
Lina Bolzoni, Sylvia Greenup
Publisher
WW Norton
Published
December 5, 2023
Format
Print & ebook
Reading lane
Italian Literary Criticism