
The 100 Best Chess Games of the 20th Century, Ranked
Paperback – Illustrated, March 7, 2006
McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers · Paperback · March 7, 2006
How does one determine the "best" chess games?
We earn from qualifying purchases.
- Who it’s for
- A ranked century of chess, judged by originality, accuracy, and artistic breadth.
- Genres
- Chess
- Published
- McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, March 7, 2006
Nearest books
Matched by what the books are about, then ordered by what their readers also loved. Most of these share its genre: Chess.
The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever PlayedIrving Chernev69% match
1000 GAMES CHESSIrving Chernev62% match
Tactics Time!Tim Brennan, Anthea Carson60% match
How to Win at ChessLevy Rozman60% match
Caro's Book of Poker TellsMike Caro55% match
CheckmateBen Mezrich55% match
The Bridge Player's BibleJulian Pottage54% match
Theory of Fun for Game DesignRaph Koster54% match
For younger readers: Chess for Kids, Basher Games: Chess, How to Win at Chess
Start with three books, and this one can be the first.
Members get a new edition every morning: a route out from their books to essays, research and talks, with the reason for each.
Start with this bookAbout this book
How does one determine the "best" chess games? What one may see as brilliant, another may see as simply necessary. Like some art lovers, chess fans claim that they know a good game when they see it, and that they know better from good. But "best"? How is this articulated?
Continue reading
This book, itself a work of art, is brought together by the use of five criteria: the overall aesthetics (clever and relentless are insufficient qualities); the originality (e.g., not yet another white knight sacrifice in a Sicilian); the level of opposition (the loser played very well); the soundness (i.e., are the moves refutable with perfect play?), accuracy (few of the moves are second-best), and difficulty (the winner overcame major obstacles) of the game; and finally the overall breadth and depth (one wants a series of sparkling ideas, with no dry patches). The 100 best games were taken from an initial field of about 7,000 played from 1900 through 1999 that had already gained some attention in magazines, books and periodicals. Three hundred games were then selected that appeared to have features consistent with the criteria. The 300 games were evaluated with scores--points given for each category of criteria. The games were then ranked, one to 100, by the score they received. No attempt was made to balance the selection according to period, nationality of players or opening. Also included is a chapter on the most overrated games of the twentieth century and one on games that would have made the list if… Includes 335 diagrams, an index of players and an index of openings by ECO codes.
How Chess Gets Ranked
A ranked century of chess, judged by originality, accuracy, and artistic breadth.
Come here for
- Criteria for weighing games, including opposition, soundness, and difficulty
- A ranking drawn from games played between 1900 and 1999
Expect
- A chapter on the century’s most overrated games
- 335 diagrams, plus indexes of players and openings
Where it sits
| Chess | 100% |
|---|
Percentages are BookFrontier’s reading of the book.
- Authors
- Andrew Soltis
- Publisher
- McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers
- Published
- March 7, 2006
- Format
- Paperback